|
Das Dokument ist frei verfügbar |
|
| Nachweis | Kein Nachweis verfügbar |
|
We consider an infinitely repeated game in which a privately informed long-lived manager raises funds from short-lived investors in order to finance a project. The manager can signal project quality to investors by making a (possibly costly) forward-looking disclosure about her project's potential for success. We find that if the manager's disclosures are costly she will never release forward-looking statements that do not convey information to external investors. Furthermore managers of firms that are transparent and face significant disclosure-related costs will refrain from forward-looking disclosures. In contrast managers of opaque and profitable firms will follow a policy of accurate disclosures. To test our findings empirically we devise an index that captures the quantity of forward-looking disclosures in public firms' 10-K reports and relate it to multiple firm characteristics. For opaque firms our index is positively correlated with a firm's profitability and financing needs. For transparent firms there is only a weak relation between our index and firm fundamentals. Furthermore the overall level of forward-looking disclosures declined significantly between 2001 and 2009 possibly as a result of the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
|
|