Titelaufnahme

Titel
Step by step - a quarterly evaluation of EU Commission's GDP forecasts / Katja Heinisch ; editor: Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH) - Member of the Leibniz Association
VerfasserHeinisch, Katja
KörperschaftLeibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle
ErschienenHalle (Saale), Germany : Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH) - Member of the Leibniz Association, October 2024
Umfang1 Online-Ressource (III, 22 Seiten, 0,87 MB) : Diagramme
Anmerkung
Literaturverzeichnis: 19-22
SpracheEnglisch
SerieIWH-Diskussionspapiere ; 2024, no. 22 (October 2024)
Schlagwörterconsensus forecasts / data revision / forecast evaluation / forecast horizon / forecasting / nowcasting / professional forecasters
URNurn:nbn:de:gbv:3:2-1101935 
Zugriffsbeschränkung
 Das Dokument ist frei verfügbar
Dateien
Step by step - a quarterly evaluation of EU Commission's GDP forecasts [0.87 mb]
Links
Nachweis
Klassifikation
Keywords
The European Commission’s growth forecasts play a crucial role in shaping policies and provide a benchmark for many (national) forecasters. The annual forecasts are built on quarterly estimates which do not receive much attention and are hardly known. Therefore this paper provides a comprehensive analysis of multi-period ahead quarterly GDP growth forecasts for the European Union (EU) euro area and several EU member states with respect to first-release and current-release data. Forecast revisions and forecast errors are analyzed and the results show that the forecasts are not systematically biased. However GDP forecasts for several member states tend to be overestimated at short-time horizons. Furthermore the final forecast revision in the current quarter is generally downward biased for almost all countries. Overall the differences in mean forecast errors are minor when using real-time data or pseudo-real-time data and these differences do not significantly impact the overall assessment of the forecasts’ quality. Additionally the forecast performance varies across countries with smaller countries and Central and Eastern European countries (CEECs) experiencing larger forecast errors. The paper provides evidence that there is still potential for improvement in forecasting techniques both for nowcasts but also forecasts up to eight quarters ahead. In the latter case the performance of the mean forecast tends to be superior for many countries.